‘we are never / Quiet, never
quite / Free from the hallucinations / Of meaning’
It’s all pattern recognition.
Our minds constantly scan our portals on the world, eyes, ears, etc.,
looking first for threats or sex or donuts, and not too long afterwards for meaning.
How does this word, this action, this object, this person fit or not fit
with existing patterns in my head? Chris
Martin’s poems seem to both provoke or replicate our restless, drifting minds-
what Zen calls the monkey mind .
At the semantic level, his short lines provoke us by setting a
direction and changing it at the line break.
For example he exploits our interest in sex with lines like,
“I thought it terribly
important to bed
A woman of learning
To feel The Sonnets”
Or
“a nearly,
chinless woman flashes me
Her smile only to withdraw it”.
This biological imperative gets named specifically in “Fertility for
Dummies” when he notes, ‘my biology
attends / To the shapes my looking / Constructs and I am here / To appreciate
the manner in which / A smoking woman / Wades through asphalt.” I appreciate his… well, appreciation for our
romantic attentions, but in “The True Meaning of Pictures” he goes beyond sex as distraction and presents romantic love
as the only solution to the ‘fantastic terror of existence.’ As Andrew Marvell similarly noted in “Dover Beach” “Ah, love,
let us be true / to one another”, Martin
concludes more broadly that ‘Our feelings instruct/ Us and yet / It’s the only
thing/ To be done, Right?’
Yet more often, it seems Martin refutes this search for meaning,
playing with our need for pattern, for narrative. There’s a fatigue built into these
poems. For a maybe 10 stanzas, I connect
the dots like the poem is a word game
that, unlike crossword puzzles, I might enjoy.
Yet the poems resist my search for resolution. In “American Music” he starts with a bald man
at an adjacent table, drifts into the contrast between emotion and the
marketplace, and then lands in Bhutan.
As we move into modernism, we’ll see more poems that resist narrative or
perhaps any meaning.
The (post)modern sense of alienation
that results from a lack of agreed upon meanings, shows up In “Jokes for
Strangers” as the ‘twenty first century’ ‘airshaft’ and even the ‘empty drawer’
which feel like metaphors for all of us ‘composing jokes for strangers.’ This seems confirmed as an ‘urban mirage’
which evokes a Matrix-like sense of futile, hallucinatory lives.
“True Meaning of Pictures” promises meaning but offers instead the central image of each of us ‘moonlighting as both / Actor and director in a film” in which “you get so fucking lost / In the production that it’s days / Later, piss running down your leg / That you remember to call cut”. That pretty much sounds like each of us at the end of first quarter, no?
No comments:
Post a Comment